RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03223
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be changed to reflect a medical retirement.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He injured his right shoulder, right ankle and had knee surgery.
He was unable to perform his duties as a squadron officer school
trainer for survival school. He should have been medically
retired. He was forced out of the Air Force under the Early Out
Rollback instead.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and his
medical records.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who
served from 7 January 1985 through 1 April 1988. The
applicants narrative reason for separation is listed as Early
Separation Program Strength Reduction and his service was
characterized as honorable. He was credited with 3 years,
2 months and 24 days of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. The applicants commander
completed AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)
Consideration, and non-selected him for reenlistment and stated
the applicant consistently failed to show the initiative and
leadership commensurate with his grade. Additionally, he noted
the applicant had not conformed to military standards.
He was separated due to the Early Separation Program Strength
Reduction with an RE code of 2X, first term, second term or
career airman and was considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the SRP. Based upon the applicants denial
of reenlistment, he was properly separated with a separation
code of J22 Strength Reduction, and denied reenlistment.
The applicant states he injured his right shoulder, right ankle
and had knee surgery. The applicants commander stated he was
counseled on numerous occasions concerning his disregard for
authority and failure to report for duty at the appointed times.
He was given several chances to change his behavior, meet
standards and adhere to rules.
Although they cannot confirm what the commanders intention was,
the fact remains that he was placed in the Rollback Program and
given an RE code of 2X.
The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or
injustice to warrant the requested change.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 10 January 2014, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we are not persuaded by the evidence
submitted in this appeal that a change in the record is
warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-03223 in Executive Session on 1 April 2014, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jun 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 6 Sep 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00931 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JGH (non-retention on active duty) and his Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP))be changed so that he can enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete DPSOA...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code LGH (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360
The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code JBK. Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code JBK. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02457
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. However, his duty performance is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X. We find no evidence of error in...